NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Issue 1065 coverNew Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications Volume 1065 published December 2005
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1065: 441–461 (2005). doi: 10.1196/annals.1370.023
Copyright © 2005 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description | purchase volume purchase this volume

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by MILLIS, M. G.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by MILLIS, M. G.
Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs

MARC G. MILLIS

NASA, John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Address for correspondence: Marc G. Millis, NASA, John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark Rd., MS 86-2, Cleveland, OH 44135-3191, USA. Voice: 216-977-7535; fax: 216-977-7545. marc.g.millis{at}nasa.gov

The term, propulsion breakthrough, refers to concepts like propellantless space drives and faster-than-light travel, the kind of breakthroughs that would make interstellar exploration practical. Although no such breakthroughs appear imminent, a variety of investigations have begun. During 1996-2002 NASA supported the breakthrough propulsion physics project to examine physics in the context of breakthrough spaceflight. Three facets of these assessments are now reported: (1) predicting benefits, (2) selecting research, and (3) recent technical progress. Predicting benefits is challenging, since the breakthroughs are still only notional concepts, but energy can serve as a basis for comparison. A hypothetical space drive would require many orders of magnitude less energy than a rocket for journeys to our nearest neighboring star. Assessing research options is challenging when the goals are beyond known physics and when the implications of success are profound. To mitigate the challenges, a selection process is described where: (1) research tasks are constrained to only address the immediate unknowns, curious effects, or critical issues; (2) reliability of assertions is more important than their implications; and (3) reviewers judge credibility rather than feasibility. The recent findings of a number of tasks, some selected using this process, are discussed. Of the 14 tasks included, six reached null conclusions, four remain unresolved, and four have opportunities for sequels. A dominant theme with the sequels is research about the properties of space, inertial frames, and the quantum vacuum.

Key Words: spacecraft propulsion • physics • project management • relativity • antigravity






footerLeft footerRight