NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Issue 1092 coverWomen's Health and Disease: Gynecologic, Endocrine, and Reproductive Issues Volume 1092 published December 2006
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1092: 331–340 (2006). doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.030
Copyright © 2006 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description | purchase volume purchase this volume

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by MASTORAKOS, G.
Articles by CREATSAS, G.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by MASTORAKOS, G.
Articles by CREATSAS, G.

Part VIII. Treating Menopausal Women under the WHI Shadow

Pitfalls of the WHIs

Women's Health Initiative

GEORGE MASTORAKOSa, EVANGELOS GR. SAKKASa, ANTONIOS M. XYDAKISa AND GEORGE CREATSASa

a Endocrine Unit, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Key Words: HRT • breast cancer • WHI • cardiovascular

Address for correspondence: George Mastorakos, M.D., D.Sc., 3 Neofytou Vamva Street, Kolonaki 106 74 Athens. Voice: 0030-210-3636230; fax: 0030-210-3636229.  e-mail: mastorak{at}mail.kapatel.gr

Recently, the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at menopause has become a matter of debate. Its utility has been questioned after the publication of the results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) studies. This trial was divided in two arms of which the first examined the use of combined HRT (continuous estrogens plus progestins) and the second the use of estrogens alone in menopausal women. The first arm was terminated prematurely at 5.2 years because the number of cases of coronary heart disease (CHD), strokes, venous thromboembolic disease, and breast cancer were more in women receiving HRT than in women receiving placebo, if the nominal confidence intervals (CIs) were taken into account. However, in the same study the authors made clear that the adjusted CIs should be taken into account instead of the nominal ones. These latter ones caused the ending of the trial. Moreover, WHI was criticized for its conclusions as far as cardiovascular disease is concerned because of serious defects regarding design of the trial. If the adjusted CIs were taken into account then the increase in adverse events was significant only for deep vein thrombosis. The second arm demonstrated that the use of estrogens was not correlated to an increase of neither breast cancer incidence nor cardiovascular disease. A closer look at the results of the WHI trial reveals that the use of HRT for 5 years should not be considered deleterious for the appearance of breast cancer, cardiovascular diseases, strokes, and pulmonary embolisms. We suggest that HRT should be given early in menopause. The regimen should be individualized for each patient. More intense follow-up should be offered to women with a positive family history of breast cancer, diagnosed coronary disease, and to women with a predisposition to deep venous thrombosis.






footerLeft footerRight