NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Skeletal Biology and Medicine, Part B: Disease Mechanisms and Therapeutic Challenges Volume 1117 published December 2007
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1117: 209–257 (2007). doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.089
Copyright © 2007 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description | purchase volume purchase this volume

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via HighWire
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by RUSSELL, R. G. G.
Articles by EBETINO, F. H.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by RUSSELL, R. G. G.
Articles by EBETINO, F. H.

Part III. Clinical and Therapeutic Challenges in Bone and Joint Disease

Bisphosphonates

An Update on Mechanisms of Action and How These Relate to Clinical Efficacy

R. GRAHAM G. RUSSELLa, ZHIDAO XIAa, JAMES E. DUNFORDa, UDO OPPERMANNa,b, AARON KWAASIa, PHILIPPA A. HULLEYa, KATHRYN L. KAVANAGHb, JAMES T. TRIFFITTa, MARK W. LUNDYa, ROGER J. PHIPPSc, BOBBY L. BARNETTd, FRASER P. COXONe, MICHAEL J. ROGERSe, NELSON B. WATTSf AND FRANK H. EBETINOc

a The Oxford University Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom b The Structural Genomics Consortium, The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom c Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mason, Ohio, USA d Department of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA e Bone and Musculoskeletal Programme, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom f University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Bone Health and Osteoporosis Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Key Words: bone resorption • osteoclasts • bisphosphonates • protein prenylation • bone metastases • myeloma • osteoporosis

Address for correspondence: Prof. R. Graham G. Russell, The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. Voice: +44-0-1865-22-7388; fax: +44-0-1865-22-7966.  graham.russell{at}ndos.ox.ac.uk

The bisphosphonates (BPs) are well established as the treatments of choice for disorders of excessive bone resorption, including Paget's disease of bone, myeloma and bone metastases, and osteoporosis. There is considerable new knowledge about how BPs work. Their classical pharmacological effects appear to result from two key properties: their affinity for bone mineral and their inhibitory effects on osteoclasts. Mineral binding affinities differ among the clinically used BPs and may influence their differential distribution within bone, their biological potency, and their duration of action. The inhibitory effects of the nitrogen-containing BPs (including alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) on osteoclasts appear to result from their inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), a key branch-point enzyme in the mevalonate pathway. FPPS generates isoprenoid lipids used for the posttranslational modification of small GTP-binding proteins essential for osteoclast function. Effects on other cellular pathways, such as preventing apoptosis in osteocytes, are emerging as other potentially important mechanisms of action. As a class, BPs share several common properties. However, as with other classes of drugs, there are obvious chemical, biochemical, and pharmacological differences among the various individual BPs. Each BP has a unique profile that may help to explain potential important clinical differences among the BPs, in terms of speed of onset of fracture reduction, antifracture efficacy at different skeletal sites, and the degree and duration of suppression of bone turnover. As we approach the 40th anniversary of the discovery of their biological effects, there remain further opportunities for using their properties for medical purposes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
K. K. VanKoevering and B. O. Williams
Transgenic Mouse Strains for Conditional Gene Deletion During Skeletal Development
IBMS BoneKEy, May 1, 2008; 5(5): 151 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



footerLeft footerRight