NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Issue 1128 coverStrategies for Risk Communication Evolution, Evidence, Experience Volume 1128 published May 2008
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1128: 53–62 (2008). doi: 10.1196/annals.1399.007
Copyright © 2008 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description | purchase volume purchase this volume

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by SANFEY, A. G.
Articles by CHANG, L. J.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by SANFEY, A. G.
Articles by CHANG, L. J.

Original Articles

Multiple Systems in Decision Making

ALAN G. SANFEYa AND LUKE J. CHANGa

a Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Key Words: neuroeconomics • decision making • multiple systems • dual processing • neural • brain

Address for correspondence: Alan G. Sanfey, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Boulevard, Tucson AZ 85721. Voice: +1-520-621-1477; fax: +1-520-621-9306.  asanfey{at}u.arizona.edu

Neuroeconomics seeks to gain a greater understanding of decision making by combining theoretical and methodological principles from the fields of psychology, economics, and neuroscience. Initial studies using this multidisciplinary approach have found evidence suggesting that the brain may be employing multiple levels of processing when making decisions, and this notion is consistent with dual-processing theories that have received extensive theoretical consideration in the field of cognitive psychology, with these theories arguing for the dissociation between automatic and controlled components of processing. While behavioral studies provide compelling support for the distinction between automatic and controlled processing in judgment and decision making, less is known if these components have a corresponding neural substrate, with some researchers arguing that there is no evidence suggesting a distinct neural basis. This chapter will discuss the behavioral evidence supporting the dissociation between automatic and controlled processing in decision making and review recent literature suggesting potential neural systems that may underlie these processes.






footerLeft footerRight