NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Issue 855 coverOLFACTION AND TASTE XII: AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM Copyright © 1998 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via HighWire
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by BARTOSHUK, L. M.
Articles by FAST, K.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by BARTOSHUK, L. M.
Articles by FAST, K.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855:793-796 (1998)
© 1998 New York Academy of Sciences

PROP (6-n-Propylthiouracil) Supertasters and the Saltiness of NaCla

LINDA M. BARTOSHUKb, VALERIE B. DUFFY, LAURIE A. LUCCHINA, JORDAN PRUTKIN AND KATHARINE FAST

Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208041, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8041, USA

aSupported in part by NIDCD Grant 00283.
bCorresponding author. Tel: (203) 785-2587 fax: (203) 737-2245: email: Linda.Bartoshuk{at}Yale.edu

Taste blindness to phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and its chemical relative 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) was discovered in the 1930s. Family studies showed that those who could not taste PTC/PROP (nontasters) carried two recessive alleles. In recent years, we have classified tasters into two groups: medium (PROP is moderately bitter) and supertasters (PROP is intensely bitter). With our classification, ~25% of Americans are nontasters, 50%, medium tasters, and 25%, supertasters. Studies showed that supertasters form a cohesive group. Anatomical studies showed that supertasters have the most fungiform papillae. Psychophysical studies showed that supertasters perceive the most intense bitterness and sweetness from a variety of compounds, the most intense burn from oral irritants, and the most intense tactile sensations from viscous solutions. Oral burn and touch are presumably perceived to be the most intense to supertasters because taste buds in fungiform papillae are innervated by the trigeminal nerve (pain, touch) as well as the chorda tympani nerve (taste).

The psychophysical scaling method used was magnitude matching with NaCl as the control modality. With this method, subjects rated the intensities of a series of NaCl and PROP solutions. The assumption that the taste of NaCl did not vary with PROP status allowed comparisons of the bitterness of PROP across subjects. Early magnitude matching studies, using sound as the control, had suggested that this assumption was reasonable. However, recent studies challenged that conclusion. Larger samples with more diverse populations, using sound as the control, showed that the taste of NaCl varied with PROP bitterness; supertasters perceived the strongest taste and nontasters, the weakest. Thus our earlier conclusions were conservative because differences between nontasters, medium tasters, and supertasters were concealed by using NaCl as a standard. Using magnitude matching with sound as the standard, or using the Green scale, which employs intensity labels, we found that the differences between PROP groups are larger. Note that the association between PROP status and salt taste is interesting in itself, since variability in salt taste may have important nutritional consequences.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Lim, L. Urban, and B. G. Green
Measures of Individual Differences in Taste and Creaminess Perception
Chem Senses, May 3, 2008; (2008) bjn016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. E. Hayes, L. M. Bartoshuk, J. R. Kidd, and V. B. Duffy
Supertasting and PROP Bitterness Depends on More Than the TAS2R38 Gene
Chem Senses, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 255 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
R. K. Palmer
The Pharmacology and Signaling of Bitter, Sweet, and Umami Taste Sensing
Mol. Interv., April 1, 2007; 7(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. S.J. Keast and J. Roper
A Complex Relationship among Chemical Concentration, Detection Threshold, and Suprathreshold Intensity of Bitter Compounds
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 245 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. G. Green and P. George
'Thermal Taste' Predicts Higher Responsiveness to Chemical Taste and Flavor
Chem Senses, September 1, 2004; 29(7): 617 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. S.J. Keast, M. M.E. Bournazel, and P. A.S. Breslin
A Psychophysical Investigation of Binary Bitter-compound Interactions
Chem Senses, May 1, 2003; 28(4): 301 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Prescott, N. Ripandelli, and I. Wakeling
Binary Taste Mixture Interactions in PROP Non-tasters, Medium-tasters and Super-tasters
Chem Senses, October 1, 2001; 26(8): 993 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. M. Small, R. J. Zatorre, and M. Jones-Gotman
Changes in Taste Intensity Perception Following Anterior Temporal Lobe Removal in Humans
Chem Senses, May 1, 2001; 26(4): 425 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. M. Bartoshuk
Comparing Sensory Experiences Across Individuals: Recent Psychophysical Advances Illuminate Genetic Variation in Taste Perception
Chem Senses, August 1, 2000; 25(4): 447 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



footerLeft footerRight