NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw
Issue 943 coverHUMAN FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTION: THE OOCYTE, THE EMBRYO, AND THE UTERUS Copyright © 2001 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description

This Volume
Table of Contents
Description
This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Citing Articles via HighWire
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Articles by GORDON, K.
Search for Related Content
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by GORDON, K.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 943:49-54 (2001)
© 2001 New York Academy of Sciences

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonists

Implications for Oocyte Quality and Uterine Receptivity

KEITH GORDON

Reproductive Medicine, Organon Inc., West Orange, New Jersey 07052, USA

Address for correspondence: Keith Gordon, Ph.D., Associate Director, Reproductive Medicine, Organon Inc., 375 Mt. Pleasant Ave., West Orange, NJ 07052. Voice: 973-325-5403; fax: 973-325-4699.
k.gordon{at}organoninc.com

Until recently, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists were the only choice available to physicians for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. The recent FDA approval of GnRH antagonists for this indication gives clinicians some new options. Results of clinical trials to date suggest that, with GnRH antagonists, much shorter treatment regimens with fewer injections and possibly less gonadotropin can achieve good clinical results. In most of the trials performed to date, however, the GnRH antagonist regimens have been associated with a slightly lower pregnancy and implantation rate than the established GnRH agonist protocols. This remains the biggest hurdle to their more general acceptance. Herein, the possible contributing factors are discussed, and the proposal made that differences in serum estradiol patterns preceding oocyte retrieval are the most likely contributing factor.

Key Words: GnRH antagonist • controlled ovarian (hyper)stimulation • in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer • uterine receptivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Mirkin, G. Nikas, J.-G. Hsiu, J. Diaz, and S. Oehninger
Gene Expression Profiles and Structural/Functional Features of the Peri-Implantation Endometrium in Natural and Gonadotropin-Stimulated Cycles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5742 - 5752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Endo, H. Honnma, T. Hayashi, M. Chida, K. Yamazaki, Y. Kitajima, A. Azumaguchi, H. Kamiya, and R. Kudo
Continuation of GnRH agonist administration for 1 week, after hCG injection, prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2548 - 2551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



footerLeft footerRight