NYAS Conferences
New York Academy of Sciences
left end
Search
divider divider feedback right end
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences login

Main

Browse Volumes

Forthcoming Volumes

Annals PrePrints

Annals Extra

E-mail Alerts

Subscriptions & Orders

New Proposals

Author Guidelines

About Annals

Help

Get free Annals volume as a NYAS member: http://www.nyas.org/annalsreaderhw

Annals PrePrints

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Annals PrePrint, published online ahead of print December 20, 2007
doi: 10.1196/annals.1405.001
Copyright © 2007 by the New York Academy of Sciences
description

This Volume
More PrePrints
Description
This Article
Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Gajdos, P.
Articles by Chevret, S.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Gajdos, P.
Articles by Chevret, S.
Treatment of myasthenia gravis exacerbations wuth IVIG

Philippe Gajdos 1* Sylvie Chevret 2

1 Intensive care department, Raymond Poincaré teaching hospital, Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Garches. VSQ university. France, Jouy en Josas, France
2 Biostatistics and medical informatics department, Saint Louis teaching hospital. Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Paris, U 717- INSERM Paris 7 University. France, Paris, Seine, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mp.gajdos{at}9online.fr.

PrePrint Abstract

Four RCTs examined the efficacy of IVIG for MG acute exacerbations. The first compared PE and IVIG. Eighty-seven patients were included. At day 15, the mean change in the Myasthenic Muscular Score (MMS) was 16.6 (95% CI 11.6 to 21.6) in the PE group and 15.6 (95% CI 10.9 to 20.3) in the IVIG group (P value = 0.65 Wilcoxon test). The second compared IVIG to oral methylprednisolone.Thirty-three patients were included. The mean (SD) sum of the two most pathological items of the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) at day 0 was 3.9 (1.1) for the IVIG group and 4.2 (0.7) for the methylprednisolone group. At day 14 these values were 2.9 (1.4) for the IVIG group and 2.8 (1.1) for the methylprednisolone group. The third compared IVIG 2g/kg versus placebo for MG worsening. The mean change in QMGS at day 14 was -2.54 in the IVIG group and -0.89 in the placebo group (p: 0.047). A significant IVIG treatment effect was observed only in patients with more severe disease: the mean difference was -0.10 for mild MG (p: 0.914) and -3.39 for moderate to severe MG (p: 0.010). The last trial compared IGIV 2g/kg versus 1g/kg for MG acute exacerbation. One hundred and seventy-three patients were included. The mean MMS change in both groups was similar (difference = 3.84 (95% CI -1.03 to 8.71; P value = 0.12).In conclusion: IVIG may be used as treatment for MG acute exacerbations. A dose of IVIG 1g/kg may be sufficient.

Key Words: myasthenia gravis, exacerbation, IVIG






footerLeft footerRight